This article aims to investigate the prevalence of sexual assault incidents involving Uber drivers, scrutinize the effectiveness of the platform’s background check policies, and analyze the potential avenues for legal recourse for victims and their families. The study highlights the necessity of enhancing background check protocols and establishing a more robust regulatory framework for rideshare companies to ensure the safety of their users.
Rideshare services, such as Uber, have revolutionized transportation options for millions of individuals worldwide. However, in recent years, the issue of sexual assault perpetrated by rideshare drivers has emerged as a significant concern. The lack of stringent background checks on potential drivers has been identified as a possible contributor to this issue. This paper seeks to analyze the frequency of sexual assault incidents involving Uber drivers, evaluate the adequacy of the platform’s background check procedures, and explore the legal options available to victims and their families.
Prevalence of Sexual Assault Incidents Involving Rideshare Drivers
In recent years, numerous reports have surfaced detailing incidents of sexual assault involving rideshare drivers, particularly those affiliated with Uber. According to a 2019 safety report published by the company, approximately 3,045 incidents of sexual assault were reported during rides in the United States in 2018 alone. These incidents, which include cases of rape, attempted rape, and unwanted sexual contact, have raised concerns about the safety of passengers utilizing rideshare services.
Uber’s Background Check Procedures Lead them to Employ Predators
Rideshare companies such as Uber have come under scrutiny for their background check policies, which are perceived by some to be inadequate. Uber’s current background check process requires potential drivers to provide their social security number, driver’s license, and proof of insurance. The company then conducts a review of the applicant’s driving history and criminal records. This process is incredibly insufficient, as it does not capture all relevant information or accurately assess an applicant’s propensity for committing sexual assault.
There are a few factors that are at play here:
- Limited Scope of Background Checks: Uber’s background check process focuses on reviewing applicants’ driving history and criminal records using their social security number, driver’s license, and proof of insurance. This limited scope will not provide a comprehensive understanding of an applicant’s background or propensity for criminal behavior.
- Inconsistencies in Criminal Record Databases: The databases used for conducting background checks may have incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate information. This can result from inconsistencies in record-keeping practices among various jurisdictions, making it challenging to identify drivers with a criminal history accurately.
- Gig Economy and Rapid Expansion: Uber, as a gig economy platform, has experienced rapid expansion in recent years. The company’s focus on quickly increasing its driver base to meet the growing demand for rideshare services have led to a less rigorous vetting process for potential drivers. This makes it easier for people who should never be getting a job as a driver to be employed, and ultimately putting the safety of passengers at risk.
- Independent Contractor Status: Uber drivers are classified as independent contractors rather than employees. This classification may result in a less stringent background check process compared to what would typically be applied to full-time employees in traditional industries. Uber will use that as an excuse, but the sad reality is they are the ones who are employing individuals who should never get a job.
- Cost Considerations: Comprehensive background checks, including in-person interviews, psychological evaluations, or fingerprint-based checks, can be expensive and time-consuming. It’s cheaper and easier to employ someone without doing extensive background checks.
Of course, most Uber drivers do not have a criminal background and do indeed provide safe rides for their passengers. However, who wants to take the risk of riding in an Uber late at night, all alone, when you cannot be confident int he hiring processes by Uber. At the end of the day, you don’t know who is driving you.
Legal Recourse for Victims and Their Families
Victims of sexual assault (and their families) at the hand of rideshare drivers may be entitled to obtaining justice and getting financial compensation. While no amount of money can make up for being sexually assaulted or raped, it is important to keep wrongdoers accountable. The appropriate legal strategy will depend on the specific circumstances of each case and the desired outcomes for the victims and their families.
Filing a Civil Lawsuit Againt Uber
Victims of sexual assault by rideshare drivers may be able to file a civil lawsuit against the driver and/or the rideshare company. In such cases, the plaintiff would seek monetary damages for physical and emotional harm, medical expenses, lost wages, and other related costs. A successful lawsuit would require demonstrating that the defendant (the driver and/or the rideshare company) was negligent in their actions, which led to the sexual assault. This might involve proving that the rideshare company failed to conduct proper background checks or implement adequate safety measures to protect passengers.
Seeking Criminal Charges Against the Perpetrator
In addition to pursuing civil litigation, victims may also seek criminal charges against the perpetrator. This would involve working with law enforcement and providing evidence to support the prosecution’s case. If found guilty, the driver could face imprisonment, fines, or both, depending on the severity of the crime and the jurisdiction in which it occurred.
Class-Action Lawsuits
In some instances, victims of sexual assault by rideshare drivers may choose to join a class-action lawsuit against the rideshare company. This type of litigation involves multiple plaintiffs with similar claims, consolidating their cases into a single legal action. Class-action lawsuits can be advantageous for victims, as they may increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and distribute the costs of litigation more evenly among the plaintiffs. In recent years, there have been several class-action lawsuits filed against rideshare companies, alleging inadequate background checks and insufficient safety measures (Doe et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 2018; Jane Roe et al. v. Lyft, Inc., 2019). The success of such lawsuits can potentially result in changes to the company’s policies and practices, ultimately benefiting all users of the platform.
Recommendations for Improving Safety and Accountability in Uber Vehicles
There are many things that can be done in order to increase safety for passengers riding in Uber vehicles:
Strengthen Background Check Procedures: Rideshare companies should implement more stringent background check protocols, including comprehensive assessments of driving history, criminal records, and other relevant information. Additionally, these companies should consider conducting in-person interviews and psychological evaluations to better gauge an applicant’s suitability for the role.
Foster Collaboration with Law Enforcement: Rideshare companies should establish stronger partnerships with law enforcement agencies to facilitate the timely reporting of sexual assault incidents and the sharing of relevant information. This collaboration would enable a more efficient response to criminal complaints and potentially deter drivers from engaging in illegal activities.
Implement Enhanced Safety Measures: To further safeguard passengers, rideshare companies should consider implementing additional safety measures, such as in-car video monitoring, real-time tracking of rides, and the integration of a panic button within the app that directly alerts law enforcement in case of emergencies.
Do you have ideas for how to make Uber rides safer for people who are riding in an Uber alone?
Contact us at anytime and let us know.